India’s huge Web3 ecosystem stays paralyzed by bureaucratic turf wars that {industry} leaders warn are costing the nation trillions, whereas Asian neighbors race forward with clear stablecoin frameworks because the U.S. guides monetary establishments by means of landmark laws.
“None of them,” Aishwary Gupta, International Head of Funds & RWAs at Polygon Labs, advised Decrypt, when requested whether or not Indian banks are able to assist stablecoin infrastructure.
In an interview with Decrypt, Gupta mentioned India’s place in what he describes as an rising “crypto chilly battle.”
He estimates India may save $68 billion (₹5.7 lakh crores) yearly by integrating stablecoins into worldwide cost flows, however regulatory inaction has left the nation, dwelling to one of many world’s largest Web3 developer and person bases, sidelined whereas different nations advance.
President Trump signed the GENIUS Act into legislation in July, offering clear regulatory tips for American monetary establishments to situation stablecoins, with main gamers getting ready dollar-backed crypto tokens beneath the established framework.
Behind the regulatory paralysis in India lies what Gupta calls a elementary “possession disaster” that he has witnessed by means of direct interactions with authorities our bodies throughout the bureaucratic spectrum.
“No person needs to take this as an possession,” Gupta defined, describing a coordination problem involving the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Electronics and Info Expertise.
He additionally flagged the Centre for Improvement of Superior Computing, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, and the Monetary Intelligence Unit, with every division relating completely different points of crypto regulation, however none of which had been keen to take duty.
“Everyone seems to be saying that different departments ought to take the lead, however nobody is stepping ahead to say they see worth in beginning this initiative,” Gupta stated, pointing to a bureaucratic gridlock that has persevered for years.
Whereas India struggles to determine a single level individual, Dubai operates by means of VARA, Hong Kong by means of HKMA, Singapore by means of MAS, and Thailand by means of devoted authorities blockchain our bodies.
“I’m doing this for nearly each Asian nation however not for India as an entire as a result of I do not know the place to begin or whom to strategy,” Gupta stated, itemizing his work designing real-world asset merchandise for governments throughout the area.
Gupta’s conversations with banking executives reportedly revealed a constant sample of institutional hesitancy rooted in sensible issues, cautious about continuing with out clear steerage from the Reserve Financial institution of India.
“Their largest problem shouldn’t be that they do not need to do it, it’s that they do not know what RBI’s stance is on it,” Gupta defined, noting that banks would embrace stablecoin infrastructure instantly upon receiving clear steerage.”
Nevertheless, whereas talking to Decrypt, Suraj Sharma, Head of India (Authorized & Compliance) at crypto alternate Gate.io, defended regulatory warning, citing “official issues—financial sovereignty, capital flight, and systemic danger.”
“Unregulated stablecoin flows can circumvent capital controls, probably undermining macroeconomic stability,” he stated.
Sharma added: “Till there’s a coverage that differentiates use circumstances like remittances, B2B settlements, and on-chain FX, the danger outweighs the reward,” urging transparency and compliance earlier than shifting ahead.
The RBI continues to push digital rupee initiatives, however Gupta questions whether or not the central financial institution digital forex strategy addresses actual alternatives.
Present cross-border cost revenues, the place banks can earn $2,000-3,000 on a $100,000 worldwide switch, create institutional resistance to cost-reducing applied sciences, he stated.
“We’d like like one financial institution to really exit and begin that for type of getting and creating this complete ripple impact,” he stated, noting how aggressive stress may drive industry-wide adoption as soon as a single establishment demonstrates decreased prices by means of stablecoin integration.
Mind drain
The regulatory vacuum has accelerated a mind drain that Gupta says has already occurred fairly than looming.
“Lots of people have already migrated. I do not assume they’re nonetheless migrating—a lot of the prime expertise has already left,” he stated, estimating that 80-85% of India’s prime crypto expertise has relocated internationally.
Regardless of gathering roughly $5.2 million (₹437.43 crores) by means of crypto taxation, India lacks significant regulatory frameworks to guard customers or foster innovation.
Even Polygon, with Indian-origin founders, has change into a world chief in stablecoin infrastructure and finds itself serving to Indian startups relocate fairly than scale domestically “to make the expertise succeed.”
In case you can’t beat them
India’s delays additionally happen amid a backdrop of rising regional competitors, with Japan reportedly licensing JPYC to situation the primary yen-backed stablecoin, backed by home financial savings and authorities bonds.
South Korea has additionally emerged as a prime competitor, with ruling and opposition events submitting competing stablecoin payments that grant emergency powers to monetary regulators whereas establishing complete frameworks for won-pegged tokens.
In the meantime, Hong Kong’s stablecoin ordinance, efficient since final month, positions the town as one of many first markets globally to control fiat-backed stablecoin issuers, although strict KYC necessities have raised {industry} issues.
Even China, regardless of restrictions on crypto buying and selling, is reportedly contemplating yuan-backed stablecoin pilots in Hong Kong and Shanghai.
“The worldwide economic system has shifted towards programmable cash and tokenized belongings, but stablecoins stay under-leveraged and misunderstood in India’s regulatory discourse,” Upmanyu Misra, Co-Founding father of TCX, advised Decrypt.
Misra described the stablecoin race as “a geopolitical competitors,” saying whereas the U.S. has already moved and Europe and the UK are following, “India should act now” if it needs a seat within the subsequent decade of digital finance.
“India’s fintech builders are prepared to maneuver, however they want indicators and never sirens,” he stated.
Over 86% of economic establishments say they’re open to adopting stablecoins, with one-third already utilizing them. Greater than half plan to combine them inside three years, citing pace, stability, and settlement effectivity as key drivers, in response to Ripple’s 2025 New Worth Report.
Gupta stays cautiously optimistic about eventual progress in India, figuring out three groups able to launch stablecoin providers instantly upon regulatory readability—one main fintech and two well-funded smaller corporations with confirmed know-how.
He suggests opening present cost infrastructure, citing Brazil’s PIX system, which permits 10% of Polygon’s world cost quantity by means of open APIs that combine stablecoins.
Nevertheless, Gupta acknowledges India faces distinctive constraints as a capital-controlled economic system, not like the US free-float market.
This capital management framework means “CBDC turns into an essential issue right here for India,” Gupta famous.
Slightly than personal stablecoins, he stated, India may allow wrapped CBDC variations or ERC-compliant tokens on different blockchains to facilitate worldwide enterprise whereas sustaining regulatory compliance.
“I’m at all times hopeful…a variety of groups that I am speaking to need to allow that,” he stated, hopeful that India will ultimately set up regulatory readability for stablecoin innovation.
