In 2018, when Bitcoin was buying and selling round $4,000 and most People, at the very least, thought cryptocurrency was a fad, Katie Haun discovered herself on a debate stage in Mexico Metropolis reverse Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize-winning economist who had dismissed digital belongings as close to nugatory. As Krugman targeted on Bitcoin’s wild worth swings, Haun steered the dialog towards one thing else — stablecoins.
“Stablecoins are actually fascinating and actually essential to this ecosystem to hedge towards that volatility,” she argued on stage, explaining how digital tokens pegged to the U.S. greenback may provide the advantages of blockchain expertise with out the ups and downs of conventional cryptocurrencies.
Krugman dismissed the thought completely.
It wasn’t precisely a turning level in Haun’s profession, nevertheless it was one second amongst others which have helped outline it. A former federal prosecutor who spent greater than a decade investigating monetary crimes, together with creating the federal government’s first cryptocurrency process drive and main investigations into the Mt. Gox hack and corrupt brokers within the Silk Street case, Haun had an uncommon background for a crypto champion. She wasn’t a libertarian ideologue or a tech founder. Coming as an alternative from regulation enforcement, she understood the legal potential and bonafide makes use of of digital belongings.
By 2018, she had already made historical past as the primary feminine associate at Andreessen Horowitz, the place she co-led their crypto funds. Founding Haun Ventures in 2022, with greater than $1.5 billion in belongings beneath administration — its workforce is now investing from a brand-new set of funds which have but to formally shut — she has been much more free to pursue her particular convictions about the way forward for cash.
The leap to hanging her personal shingle hasn’t been with out its complexities. Regardless of her position at a16z and the business connections that got here with it, the 2 haven’t publicly co-invested in something since early 2022, shortly after she launched her fund, and Haun, who joined the board of Coinbase in 2017, stepped off it final yr, whereas Marc Andreessen, who took colleague Chris Dixon’s seat in 2020, stays a director.
When requested Wednesday night time at yourcryptonewstoday’s StrictlyVC occasion about her relationship with Andreessen Horowitz, she downplayed any potential friction whereas acknowledging they aren’t collaborators precisely. “There’s no gentleman’s settlement,” she mentioned, echoing this editor’s query about whether or not there’s any understanding to keep away from competing along with her former employer. “The truth is, I nonetheless speak to Andreessen Horowitz. You’re proper that we haven’t actually performed any offers collectively of late.”
The obvious lack of co-investment may replicate the cutthroat business or the challenges related to leaving one in all Silicon Valley’s most outstanding companies to compete instantly with former colleagues. Regardless of the case, Haun is now charting her personal course, and on the coronary heart of it’s stablecoins, that are cryptocurrencies designed to take care of a secure worth by being pegged to conventional belongings just like the U.S. greenback.
Not like Bitcoin or Ethereum, which may swing wildly in worth, stablecoins like Circle’s USDC or Tether’s USDT are supposed to commerce at precisely $1, making a digital illustration of conventional forex that may transfer on blockchain networks.
Certainly, fast-forward to at present, and Haun’s perception in stablecoins seems to be more and more prescient. Stablecoins — which barely existed in 2015 — now signify 1 / 4 of a trillion {dollars} in worth. They’ve grow to be the 14th largest holder of U.S. Treasuries globally. Reportedly, for the primary time final yr, stablecoin transaction quantity exceeded Visa’s.
“I feel individuals who checked out stablecoins just a few years in the past thought, what’s the worth prop?” Haun mentioned Wednesday night time. “You’ve requested me this earlier than. You mentioned, ‘Why do I would like stablecoins?’ And I mentioned, “I confer with this as an ‘If it really works for me, it really works for everybody’ downside.”
In actuality, for many People, the present monetary system works fairly effectively. We now have Venmo, financial institution accounts, bank cards. However Haun, drawing on her prosecutor’s understanding of worldwide monetary methods, says she has lengthy been conscious that the U.S. expertise isn’t common.
In international locations with unstable currencies or restricted banking infrastructure, stablecoins provide one thing distinctive, she argues, which is prompt entry to secure, dollar-denominated worth that may be despatched anyplace on this planet for pennies. “Individuals in Turkey don’t consider Tether as a cryptocurrency,” she mentioned Wednesday, “They consider Tether as cash.”
The expertise has developed dramatically since these early debates, actually. Stablecoins as soon as value $12 to ship internationally. And Circle says its USDC stablecoin is absolutely backed one-to-one by {dollars} held in JP Morgan financial institution accounts and audited by Large 4 accounting companies.
Little surprise the company world is taking discover in a giant method. Walmart and Amazon are reportedly exploring stablecoins, as are different goliaths like Uber, Apple, and Airbnb. The reason being easy economics. Stablecoins present a method to transfer the worth of U.S. {dollars} utilizing cryptocurrency rails as an alternative of conventional banking infrastructure, probably saving these retail-heavy corporations billions in processing charges.
However the shift has critics apprehensive about financial chaos. Whereas Circle and Tether are dedicated to having sufficient reserves to assist their tokens, not like conventional banks, there’s no insured authorities safety behind these reserves. Relatedly, if main firms can problem their very own currencies, what occurs to financial coverage and banking regulation?
The issues run deeper than simply financial disruption. Not all stablecoins are created equal, and plenty of lack the backing and oversight that corporations like Circle present. Whereas well-regulated stablecoins like USDC are backed by precise {dollars} in U.S. Treasury securities, others function with much less transparency or depend on complicated algorithmic mechanisms which have confirmed susceptible to break down. (TerraUSD has had essentially the most specular crash to this point, wiping out $60 billion in worth when it nosedived.)
Corruption issues specifically got here into sharp focus just lately when President Donald Trump’s household issued its personal stablecoin, a transfer that highlighted potential conflicts of curiosity in an business the place political affect can instantly affect market worth and regulatory outcomes.
These issues got here to a head as Congress debated the GENIUS Act, laws that will create a federal framework for stablecoin regulation. The invoice handed the Senate early final week with bipartisan assist, with 14 Democrats crossing occasion traces to assist it. It now awaits a Home vote earlier than probably reaching the president’s desk.
However Senator Elizabeth Warren, the rating member on the Senate Banking Committee, has been significantly vocal in her opposition, calling the laws a “superhighway for Donald Trump’s corruption.” Her criticism facilities on a notable hole within the invoice: whereas it prohibits members of Congress and senior govt department officers from issuing stablecoin merchandise, it says nothing about their relations.
Requested about Warren’s issues on Wednesday night time, Haun virtually rolled her eyes. “I feel it’s actually ironic that Elizabeth Warren or different Democrats who do name this corruption aren’t working to cross crypto laws,” she mentioned. “Had there been guidelines of the highway in place [already], there would have been a framework, there would have been clear guidelines for what’s a safety, what’s a commodity, and what are the patron protections round that.”
Haun, whose enterprise capital agency has made quite a few stablecoin investments together with Bridge (acquired by Stripe for reportedly 10 occasions ahead income), is basically supportive of the laws, unsurprisingly. However she has one notable criticism: the invoice’s prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins.
“I’m undecided that yield-bearing stablecoins are a good suggestion for customers within the U.S., however I’m undecided {that a} prohibition is a good suggestion,” she informed StrictlyVC attendees. The difficulty comes all the way down to who income from the curiosity earned on stablecoin reserves. Presently, that cash goes to corporations like Circle and Coinbase. However Haun wonders why customers shouldn’t get that yield, similar to they might with a financial savings account.
“When you had a financial savings account or checking account and also you’re getting yield on that, you’re getting curiosity,” she defined. “What for those who simply mentioned, ‘No, the financial institution will get curiosity, not you,’ and so they’re lending out your cash?”
Haun was much less nuanced in relation to one other Warren concern: that if the GENIUS Act is signed into regulation, stablecoins may grow to be a automobile for cash laundering and terrorism financing.
“Criminals are nice beta testers of all applied sciences,” mentioned Haun. “However this expertise is very traceable, far more traceable than money. The most important legal instrument is the greenback invoice.” (Based on Haun, the Treasury Division has testified that 99.9% of cash laundering crimes succeed utilizing conventional financial institution wires, not cryptocurrency.)
In the meantime, she mentioned, the regulatory readability that laws just like the GENIUS Act supplies may really make the system safer by distinguishing between official, well-backed stablecoins from extra experimental or dangerous variants.
The truth is, because the stablecoin ecosystem continues to mature, Haun sees even larger modifications forward. She envisions a future the place all types of belongings — from cash market funds to actual property to non-public credit score — get “tokenized” and made obtainable 24/7 to international markets.
“It’s only a digital illustration of a bodily asset,” she explains. “BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, they’ve already tokenized their cash market funds. That’s already occurred.”
Based on Haun, tokenized belongings may democratize entry to investments in methods just like how Netflix democratized leisure. As a substitute of getting to be rich sufficient to satisfy minimal funding thresholds, somebody with $25 and a smartphone may purchase fractional possession in a share of Apple or Amazon, for instance.
“Simply because one thing’s inevitable doesn’t imply it’s imminent,” Haun mentioned on Wednesday. However she’s assured the transformation is coming, pushed by the identical forces that made stablecoins profitable: they’re sooner, cheaper, and, she insists, extra accessible than conventional alternate options.
Wanting again at that 2018 debate with Krugman, Haun’s persistence appears to have paid off. A significant query now isn’t whether or not digital {dollars} will reshape the monetary system however maybe extra importantly, whether or not regulators can hold tempo with the expertise whereas addressing official issues about corruption, client safety, and monetary stability.
Haun doesn’t appear involved. Whereas critics level to the truth that stablecoins signify simply 2% of worldwide funds, questioning their product-market match, Haun sees this as a well-recognized tech adoption story — one which has performed out repeatedly and infrequently takes longer than individuals initially think about.
“We expect it’s actually early days,” she informed the group.
