By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Notification
yourcryptonewstoday yourcryptonewstoday
  • Home
  • News
    • Crypto Bubbles
    • Regulations
    • Metaverse
  • MarketCap
  • Altcoins
    • Solana
  • Crypto
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Cardano
  • Blockchain
  • Market
    • Nft
  • Mining
  • Exchange
  • Analysis
    • Evaluation
    • Multi Currency
Reading: The proposed soft fork in Bitcoin is “a bad idea”
Share
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 77,924.00
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 2,446.88
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 690.61
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 1.00
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 1.39
binance-usd
BUSD (BUSD) $ 0.997523
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.084855
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.199954
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 104.52
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 0.837349
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.337957
Your Crypto News TodayYour Crypto News Today
  • Home
  • News
  • MarketCap
  • Altcoins
  • Crypto
  • Blockchain
  • Market
  • Mining
  • Exchange
  • Analysis
Search
  • Home
  • News
    • Crypto Bubbles
    • Regulations
    • Metaverse
  • MarketCap
  • Altcoins
    • Solana
  • Crypto
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Cardano
  • Blockchain
  • Market
    • Nft
  • Mining
  • Exchange
  • Analysis
    • Evaluation
    • Multi Currency
© 2024 All Rights reserved | Protected by Your Cryptonews Today
Your Crypto News Today > News > The proposed soft fork in Bitcoin is “a bad idea”
News

The proposed soft fork in Bitcoin is “a bad idea”

October 29, 2025 2 Min Read
Share
The proposed soft fork in Bitcoin is “a bad idea”

BIP-444, a brand new proposal to introduce a tender fork (tender fork) in Bitcoin, generates debates and exchanges of opinions locally.

The initiative, as defined by CriptoNoticias, seeks to quickly modify the consensus guidelines with the purpose of mitigating arbitrary information storage throughout the community.

This kind of information, from messages to information or pictures in transactions, is taken into account like spam in blocks Bitcoin by many bitcoin builders and collaborators, even elevating considerations concerning the potential unlawful content material that they may embed within the community.

Chun Wang, co-founder of the F2Pool mining pool (one of many largest on the planet), flatly rejected BIP-444:

BIP-444 (the tender fork proposal) is a foul thought. I’m not going to take part in any tender fork. Short-term or not. It saddens me to see some builders transferring additional and additional away from the fitting path.

Chun Wang, co-founder of the F2Pool mining pool.

In the identical vein as Wang, famend developer Jameson Lopp joined the criticism by commenting: “I heard that 444 can be a really dangerous quantity”alluding to the quantity that identifies BIP-444 (Bitcoin Enchancment Proposal 444).

Confronted with these reactions, developer Luke Dashjr, who was recognized because the creator of the tender fork initiative, responded:

Customers resolve protocol adjustments, not miners.

Luke Dashjr, maintainer of Bitcoins Knots.

His assertion refers back to the central concept that Bitcoin doesn’t rely on a single authorityhowever of the broad social consensus between those that run the community nodes and people who use the protocol.

In that logic, if the vast majority of the nodes undertake an replace, the miners (answerable for processing transactions) should conform to the brand new guidelines to proceed being a part of the community and acquire rewards.

On this approach, Dashjr careworn that the true decision-making energy in Bitcoin lies with the customers, not with those that present computing energy.

You Might Also Like

Blockchain won’t win until it outruns TradFi

Bitcoin ETFs attract $1.2 billion in inflows to kick off 2026

Cardano Price Prediction For The End Of 2024: Can ADA Breach $1.5?

Chainlink CCIP Launches on Solana, Linking $19B in Assets

Ethereum Eyes $4,000 with Bullish Momentum: Analysts Predict $15K

TAGGED:Bitcoin (BTC)BlockchainMinerosnodosRelevantesTechnology
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular News

Bitcoin’s failed $81,000 breakout just put $75,000 back on the table
Bitcoin’s failed $81,000 breakout just put $75,000 back on the table
Are NFTs Making a Return to Auction Houses?
Are NFTs Making a Return to Auction Houses?
Bitcoin miners' profits decline for the fourth consecutive month
Bitcoin miners’ profits decline for the fourth consecutive month
German tradFi giants confirm trial to mine Bitcoin with surplus energy to stabilize grid
German tradFi giants confirm trial to mine Bitcoin with surplus energy to stabilize grid
Bitcoin Not a Threat to US Dollar, Donald Trump Asserts
Bitcoin Not a Threat to US Dollar, Donald Trump Asserts
Bitcoin Mining Costs Soar as Miners Expect Long-Term Price Boosts
Bitcoin Mining Costs Soar as Miners Expect Long-Term Price Boosts

You Might Also Like

Why $60,000 decides whether Bitcoin’s recent strength cracks as nearly half the market slips into loss
Bitcoin

Why $60,000 decides whether Bitcoin’s recent strength cracks as nearly half the market slips into loss

April 5, 2026
Spot Bitcoin ETFs mark first anniversary with four among Top 20 in AUM
Bitcoin

Spot Bitcoin ETFs mark first anniversary with four among Top 20 in AUM

January 11, 2025
image
Blockchain

Blockchain Explorers Made Easy for Beginners

December 10, 2025
Dogecoin experiments with post-quantum signatures without altering its current protocol
News

Dogecoin experiments with post-quantum signatures without altering its current protocol

April 10, 2026
yourcryptonewstoday yourcryptonewstoday
yourcryptonewstoday yourcryptonewstoday

"In the fast-paced world of digital finance, staying informed is essential, and we’re here to help you navigate the evolving landscape of crypto currencies, blockchain, & digital assets."

Editor Choice

The Chinese Company That Gained Much Attention Due to Its Losses Closes All Its Ethereum (ETH) Positions! Here’s the Total Loss!
Bitcoin Advanced NVT Sits Above This Critical Threshold — What It Means For Price Action
Bitcoin Faces ‘Great Reset’ Risk, Mike McGlone Warns

Subscribe

* indicates required
/* real people should not fill this in and expect good things - do not remove this or risk form bot signups */

Intuit Mailchimp

Follow Us on Socials

We use social media to react to breaking news, update supporters and share information

Twitter Linkedin Facebook
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
Reading: The proposed soft fork in Bitcoin is “a bad idea”
Share
Follow US
© 2025 All Rights reserved | Protected by Your Crypto News Today
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?