Hyperliquid raised round $2 million in day by day commissions on January 16, putting itself because the community with the best fee income.
This milestone allowed it to surpass Solana (USD 1.4 million), Tron (USD 1.1 million), BNB Chain (USD 521,000), Bitcoin (USD 316,900) and Ethereum (USD 314,900), based on knowledge from the Artemis website.
In response to the picture, the whole charges between the principle networks had been round 5.8 million {dollars}, with Hyperliquid concentrating the biggest particular person portion.
As of January 16, the common charges of that community had been round USD 0.025 per transactionbased on the Hyperscreener browser.
Commissions in Hyperliquid replicate the rising use of its leveraged markets. It has even turn out to be widespread on social networks to trace whales that guess for or in opposition to the markets, just like the one which received $150 million with the autumn of bitcoin, as reported by CriptoNoticias. Given its open nature, anybody can view the positions of merchants on the community.
Hyperliquid outperforms different networks from 2025
Hyperliquid is a community centered on buying and selling, particularly derivatives markets, designed to course of excessive quantity transactions with low latency and diminished prices. Therefore the determine gathered in commissions this January 16 not be a circumstantial reality.
Coinciding with what was reported by this medium, Artemis knowledge exhibits that since Could 2025 Hyperliquid has been the community that collects probably the most cash in commissions, with October being the month with the best income. On that date surpassed the 107 million {dollars}.
Past at present sustaining management in that metric, Hyperliquid’s gathered month-to-month commissions have registered a detrimental pattern since October.”
For instance, final December, it collected nearly $50 million in commissions, lower than half of what it recorded in October. Nevertheless, different networks, equivalent to Bitcoin and Ethereum, have additionally recorded detrimental conduct when it comes to charges, so it looks like a common market pattern.
