Binance-affiliated funding agency YZi Labs (previously Binance Labs) publicly accused asset supervisor 10X Capital on Wednesday of failing to adjust to US securities disclosure necessities. The dispute comes amid broader governance modifications at CEA Industries.
In an official weblog submit, the agency alleged that 10X Capital did not adjust to SEC guidelines requiring disclosure of possession stakes as soon as a sure threshold is reached.
YZi Labs Accuses 10X Capital of Reporting Violations
The dispute facilities on CEA Industries, identified by its Nasdaq ticker, BNC. The corporate describes itself as managing the world’s largest company treasury of $BNB.
For crypto market individuals, the scenario is especially related. BNC’s treasury technique ties it carefully to the Binance ecosystem. Governance or asset administration modifications on the firm may have an effect on how its giant $BNB holdings are managed.
Each YZi Labs and 10X Capital maintain positions in BNC, and up to date developments indicated an escalating contest over governance.
The newest accusations come only one week after BNC publicly refuted earlier claims made by YZi Labs relating to the corporate’s compliance with Nasdaq guidelines tied to the timing of its Annual Assembly of Stockholders. In that February 13 assertion, BNC mentioned it was absolutely compliant and rejected what it described as “false” and “reckless” assertions.
In a proper letter addressed to 10X Capital on Wednesday, YZi Labs alleged that the asset supervisor did not correctly report its possession stake in CEA Industries.
https://t.co/g2TA9gr7q0
— YZi Labs (@yzilabs) February 18, 2026
Below US securities legislation, traders who accumulate greater than 5% of a public firm’s shares should disclose their holdings. That means, different shareholders are conscious of potential shifts in affect.
In keeping with YZi Labs, 10X Capital has owned greater than 5% of BNC’s shares since late 2025. Nevertheless, it didn’t file a Schedule 13D to formally report that stake or disclose that it might have been appearing along with different shareholders.
YZi Labs additionally alleged that 10X Capital founder Hans Thomas, who serves on BNC’s board, didn’t submit the required SEC submitting that administrators should full to reveal their preliminary share possession within the firm.
“SEC disclosure guidelines are usually not ‘private preferences’ or ‘optionally available housekeeping’ – they’re the baseline customary and non-negotiable obligations for anybody who needs a seat on a public firm Board,” mentioned Alex Odagiu, an funding companion at YZi Labs. “In case you can not handle well timed Part 16 filings and clear possession disclosure, you shouldn’t be managing a public firm.”
The allegations surfaced the identical day BNC’s Board of Administrators introduced a proposal to amend its Asset Administration Settlement with 10X Capital.
Governance Stakes Rise Over Asset Deal
In its proposal, the Board mentioned it’s in search of decrease administration charges, a shorter contract time period, and extra versatile termination provisions. It described the transfer as a part of a broader effort to reinforce operational flexibility and long-term worth.
It adopted what it described as a complete overview of the settlement and got here after YZi Labs publicly confirmed the termination of a beforehand undisclosed aspect settlement with 10X that had restricted amendments to the deal.
🔔 $BNC Board is transferring ahead with a proposal to amend the Asset Administration Settlement with 10X Capital.
Searching for:
• Decrease charges
• Shorter time period
• Higher termination rights10X has indicated willingness to renegotiate.
Sit up for constructive discussions forward for the…
— $BNB Community Firm (BNC) (@BNBNetworkCo) February 18, 2026
With that restriction lifted, the Board mentioned it’s transferring ahead with renegotiation discussions.
The developments unfold alongside YZi Labs’ personal regulatory filings. The funding agency beforehand disclosed that it had crossed the 5% possession threshold following the corporate’s share repurchases and later shaped a shareholder group.
Crossing that threshold is critical below each federal securities legislation and Nevada company legislation, the place CEA Industries is included.
Whereas federal guidelines require disclosure, Nevada legislation governs shareholder rights and board authority. Possession ranges can have an effect on a shareholder’s potential to provoke actions, resembling consent solicitations, or to affect governance choices.
Towards that backdrop, the timing of the disclosure dispute and the Board’s push to revise 10X’s asset administration settlement counsel the disagreement might lengthen past regulatory filings. It could additionally replicate deeper questions over management and strategic route on the $BNB-focused public firm.

