Crypto fund supervisor Justin Bons stated Ethereum’s push towards a ZK-EVM design is a significant mistake that would completely harm the community.
In an in depth put up, he argued that ZK proofs are extraordinarily costly to generate and impose {hardware} necessities that scale poorly as demand rises.
In keeping with Bons, producing ZK-EVM proofs already requires arrays of high-end GPUs. At present Ethereum speeds, builders would want dozens of top-tier playing cards simply to maintain up. {Hardware} prices alone can exceed $80,000, with greater throughput pushing that quantity previous $200,000.
Ethereum is in large bother: The crowning jewel of ETH’s roadmap is a poison tablet:
The ZK-EVM is horrible & will wreck ETH except it corrects course!
Counting on ZK means catastrophically limiting ETH whereas including insane {hardware} necessities!
A transparent case of over-engineering: 🧵…
— Justin Bons (@Justin_Bons) January 6, 2026
Builder Prices Elevate Centralization Issues
The critique facilities on Ethereum’s transfer towards Proposer Builder Separation (PBS) paired with ZK proofs. Bons stated this setup shifts energy away from validators and concentrates it amongst a small group of builders who can afford the {hardware}.
He warned that as prices scale linearly with velocity and capability, Ethereum faces a pressured trade-off. Both efficiency stays restricted, or decentralization erodes. In his view, each outcomes undermine Ethereum’s core claims.
Bons in contrast ZK-EVM efficiency with competing networks. He famous that even with huge GPU setups, ZK-EVM block manufacturing can take 8 to 12 seconds.
However, Solana validators function with sub-second block occasions and much decrease relative {hardware} prices. He argued this hole explains why Ethereum shouldn’t be even making an attempt to compete on uncooked velocity.
With high-frequency buying and selling and perpetual exchanges driving most on-chain income, slower block occasions stay a structural drawback.
Buterin Defends a Completely different Objective
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin not too long ago stated that Ethereum was constructed to outlive censorship, outages, and deplatforming slightly than optimize latency.
“Ethereum was not created to make finance environment friendly or apps handy. It was created to set individuals free”
This was an necessary – and controversial – line from the Trustless Manifesto ( https://t.co/1F1Fe9OQPh ), and it’s value revisiting it and higher understanding what it…
— vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) January 5, 2026
He pointed to Ethereum’s lengthy uptime and its position because the settlement layer for tens of billions of {dollars} in DeFi. In the meantime, Bons claims that ZK-heavy scaling dangers creating hidden centralization whereas nonetheless failing to ship aggressive throughput.
Debate Intensifies
Ethereum’s 2026 roadmap contains upgrades geared toward greater capability utilizing fuel will increase and ZK proofs. Bons argued that these adjustments come too late and nonetheless fail to deal with the core velocity downside.
Bons concluded that Ethereum is intentionally staying sluggish to suit ZK computation limits, calling that alternative damning.
In the meantime, the controversy within the crypto neighborhood intensified after a person requested whether or not Ethereum can survive when ZK-EVM paths require $100,000 {hardware}, but nonetheless path Solana by large margins. Bons replied that survival is feasible, however development shouldn’t be assured as a result of ETH is 1/138th the capability and 1/thirtieth the velocity of SOL.
One other developer claimed future upgrades would enable ZK nodes to run on modest {hardware}. Bons rejected that view, saying present benchmarks present no viable path with out main cryptography breakthroughs that builders have already awaited for years.
Associated: Buterin Urges ETH Devs to Deal with Scalable Decentralization; Not New Memes
Disclaimer: The data offered on this article is for informational and academic functions solely. The article doesn’t represent monetary recommendation or recommendation of any variety. Coin Version shouldn’t be answerable for any losses incurred because of the utilization of content material, merchandise, or companies talked about. Readers are suggested to train warning earlier than taking any motion associated to the corporate.
