Aurora Intents has processed greater than $19 million throughout 1,718 swaps for the zkSNARKS public sale, accounting for over half of the property transformed and deposited into the $ZEC-denominated sale.
Aurora Intents dealt with half of the public sale quantity
Aurora Labs CEO Declan Hannon instructed crypto.information that Aurora Intents processed simply over $19 million of the $36.94 million deposited for the zkSNARKS public sale, with the conversions accomplished by 1,718 swaps.
“It’s the worth, the greenback worth of property transformed into $ZEC. Aurora Intents processed over 50% of the overall quantity swapped and deposited for the public sale. Simply over $19M out of $36.94M moved by us throughout 1718 swaps,” Hannon mentioned.
The determine measures the worth routed by Aurora’s cross-chain infrastructure, moderately than the variety of bids or accomplished $NFT purchases. Among the property have been connected to unsuccessful bids and later turned eligible for refunds beneath the public sale guidelines.
Public sale outcomes confirmed that individuals submitted 16,971 bids for 8,000 out there zkSNARKS property. Complete submitted quantity reached 25,305 $ZEC, value roughly $36.94 million on the time, whereas the sale cleared at 1.5 $ZEC per asset.
Beneath the sealed, uniform-price format, bidders positioned provides with out seeing the total order guide. The 8,000 profitable bidders paid the identical clearing worth, whatever the most quantity entered of their unique bids.
Multiplying the clearing worth by the 8,000 allocations provides 12,000 $ZEC in accomplished gross sales. Roughly 13,309 $ZEC, valued at about $19.43 million on the public sale’s reported change fee, was allotted for refunds to unsuccessful bidders or for quantities submitted above the ultimate worth.
Stablecoins led cross-chain $ZEC conversions
Stablecoins provided a lot of the worth that Aurora Intents transformed into $ZEC, based on Hannon. USDC alone accounted for 27% of the funds routed by the system and arrived from 4 networks, with Solana contributing the biggest portion.
Native $ETH ranked because the next-largest particular person supply asset, representing 21% of Aurora’s public sale quantity. Members might additionally enter with BTC, $SOL, $BNB, and different supported property moderately than buying $ZEC by a separate change transaction.
“Most individuals bidding on a $ZEC-denominated public sale don’t already maintain $ZEC and didn’t wish to go purchase some simply to bid. Aurora Intents powered the cross-chain swaps,” Hannon mentioned.
The source-asset combine positioned stablecoins on the middle of the conversion circulate whereas additionally displaying demand from customers holding property on different networks. As a substitute of bridging an asset manually, discovering a $ZEC market and making one other switch, every bidder might request a specified $ZEC output by one transaction instruction.
Cross-chain entry has additionally turn into a part of $NFT market competitors. In September, OpenSea added Solana NFTs to its OS2 platform, permitting customers to commerce supported collections inside a market that already covers greater than 25 networks.
Stablecoin issuers have taken an identical multichain route. In June, Ripple expanded RLUSD entry to greater than 40 networks by Wormhole, together with Base, Optimism, Ink, Unichain and the XRP Ledger EVM sidechain.
$NEAR Intents solvers locked the quoted $ZEC output
For the zkSNARKS public sale, a bidder signed an intent stating how a lot $ZEC the transaction ought to produce and the utmost source-asset quantity the bidder was prepared to spend. $NEAR Intents solvers then competed to fill the request on the quoted fee, Hannon mentioned.
“The consumer indicators one intent—bid this a lot in $ZEC as much as the quantity specified. Now the solver community, $NEAR Intents, comes into play. Solvers compete to fill it at that quoted fee.”
Based on Hannon, the speed was mounted earlier than the consumer signed the transaction, whereas the quote included a minimal $ZEC output. A market transfer past the permitted vary induced the transaction to fail as an alternative of filling at a worse worth.
“If the market strikes previous it, the commerce merely doesn’t execute. If something fails, funds return mechanically to a refund handle provided up entrance,” he added.
Though the setup eliminated post-signature slippage, it didn’t take away each dependency from the transaction path. Hannon mentioned customers relied on the $NEAR Intents settlement contract, market makers issuing quotes and bridges holding the underlying supply property.
Settlement befell by the $NEAR Intents 1Click Swap API, which Hannon mentioned has processed greater than $30 billion. He added that 1Click didn’t take custody of consumer funds throughout the course of, whereas Aurora neither acted as a counterparty nor dealt with the property immediately.
Non-custodial execution doesn’t get rid of smart-contract, bridge, or liquidity-provider publicity. In Hannon’s description, every part nonetheless carried out a selected function earlier than the transformed $ZEC reached the public sale.
For U.S. customers, cross-chain execution doesn’t settle whether or not an $NFT sale or market exercise falls beneath federal securities guidelines. The U.S. Securities and Change Fee closed its OpenSea investigation in February 2025 with out submitting fees, however the resolution didn’t create a blanket exemption for $NFT issuers or buying and selling platforms. The authorized remedy of an asset can nonetheless rely on its sale phrases, promised advantages, and promotion.
Zcash privateness began after source-chain exercise
Whereas the public sale used Zcash for personal settlement, Hannon drew a line between the shielded $ZEC transaction and the exercise that occurred earlier than property reached the community.
“Zcash’s shielded pool does what it says on the vacation spot aspect; the bid itself isn’t seen,” Hannon mentioned.
“What I received’t do is inform you the entire path is invisible, as a result of the leg earlier than it lands on a public chain, identical as it might in the event you despatched that asset wherever else.”
A consumer getting into with $ETH, $SOL, $BNB, or a stablecoin first initiated a transaction on the asset’s supply community. Public blockchains document pockets addresses, transferred quantities, and transaction instances, leaving the preliminary leg seen even when the ensuing $ZEC bid enters a shielded pool.
On the Zcash aspect, shielded transfers use zero-knowledge proofs to confirm {that a} transaction is legitimate with out publishing the sender, recipient or transferred quantity. The safety applies to the shielded $ZEC transaction, not mechanically to each previous motion on one other blockchain.
The public sale supplied 8,000 property from a ten,000-item zkSNARKS assortment. Mission info assigned one other 1,000 property to early Snarklist individuals and reserved 1,000 for grants, contributors, artists, and the group.
Following the sale, on-chain investigator ZachXBT alleged that the venture lacked sensible utility and in contrast its construction with earlier $NFT “cash grabs,” based on ChainCatcher. The report mentioned he questioned the roughly $17 million retained after refunds, in addition to the gathering’s group allocation and royalty construction.
